Training for Non-English Speaking Employees

Workers from non-English speaking countries are often extremely talented with great work ethics, but many employers mistakenly let language and cultural differences prevent them becoming valued employees, says Labour Solutions Australia’s Managing Director, Andrew Northcott.

Northcott, who estimates that within 12 to 18 months, sourcing talent from non-English speaking countries will be a “key imperative” for many employers, says that although an English-as-a-second-language (ESL) graduate’s English might suffice for an entry-level role, as they climb the ladder and expectations rise, their ability to communicate and build relationships becomes critical.

ESL workers don’t just need to be fluent in English, they need to have “business-grade” English, he says.

Too often, though, they have been sent to English language training that is “not designed for business”. For example, all their training exercises talk about going to the supermarket instead of using the context of attending a work meeting or giving a presentation, he says.

Teach business English – and business culture

The onboarding process for ESL workers should also address cultural differences, Northcott says.

Providing some form of business culture training is important for those people who are not familiar with the values and norms of the Australian workplace environment. They need to know which behaviours are and are not acceptable – “the rules of engagement”, so to speak.

Northcott says it can take as little as two days of seminars and workshops to provide a foreign worker with a foundation for understanding relevant cultural differences, and that this training should be provided early on.

“To put that understanding in place from day one means they know their way around and they’re starting to be aware.

“It will take time for them to adapt, but the sooner they get the knowledge, the sooner they’re going to start to adapt.”

Cultural training helps to prevent workers from doing or saying something inappropriate, creating a bad impression from the start.

However, “traditionally the only cultural training people coming to Australia from different backgrounds ever get is something around kangaroos and barbecues – it’s not specific and it’s not relevant to the business culture,” Northcott says.

Instead, new employees need answers to questions such as, “What is expected of me in a meeting?”

“What [foreign workers] often don’t know is that you’re expected to speak up and contribute – in many cultures you wait to be asked to do that,” Northcott says.

If a worker doesn’t realise it’s OK to have an opinion – perhaps even one that differs from their supervisor – they could remain silent throughout a meeting.

“The [supervisor's] impression might be, ‘Why have I got this person in my team? They’re too quiet, they’re not contributing, I’ve made a bad decision’.

“In many cases it’s because they’re working off a different set of rules,” he says.

Cultural training is also important because it helps workers to integrate well into their teams.

“It’s all about fitting in with the values of the organisation and the values of the team, so teamwork necessitates relationship building, and relationship building necessitates communication and fit. Without those two things… you’re not going to have good teamwork,” he says.

“This is evident if you walk into many IT teams or finance teams [where] a large proportion of the team [is] from non-English-speaking backgrounds. Without a lot of effort to help everybody integrate, it can work against the objectives of the organisation around fostering good teamwork and common values.”

Play it safe

Employers of ESL workers should be particularly concerned about the nature of safety training they provide, Northcott says.

“If organisations are putting people from non-English speaking backgrounds through the same safety training as people from native English speaking backgrounds, there may be some risks to consider.”

An ESL employee might understand and “pass” a safety training course, but still be vulnerable, he warns.

“Safety systems are reliant on your willingness to say, ‘No, I’m not prepared to do that activity on the basis it’s unsafe.’ In some cultures, to say that to a more senior member of staff would be unthinkable, so even if I’ve understood the safety training and I know that doing that particular activity is unsafe and I’m supposed to tell somebody, culturally that may be very, very difficult.

“So understanding and adapting to the culture – [realising] it’s OK to do that, is really important.”

Employers should also consider offering cultural training to ensure their existing managers are equipped to manage multicultural teams.

“This is not about management skills, [it's] about an awareness of other cultures,” he

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Safe use and guarding of meat processing machinery

The purpose of this safety alert is to highlight the risks associated with using small meat processing machines for slicing, mincing, grinding or tenderising meat and meat products.

Background

There are a number of imported meat slicing machines that can expose operators to a serious risk of injury. They are often found in takeaway outlets and restaurants, although butchers and caterers may also use similar types of meat processing machines.

Contributing factors

The main hazards are:

The rotating cutting blades can be accessed through the feed hopper (see Photograph 2) and the dispenser chute. Contact with the moving blades can cause severe injuries.

The cutting blades are susceptible to rusting and food residue can build up on surfaces, which are difficult to access for cleaning and sanitising. Where the surfaces contacted by food are not effectively cleaned, food health issues can arise. For further information see the food safety link below.

The feed hopper and top cover are regularly removed for cleaning purposes, further exposing the blades. This type of machine will continue to operate with the hopper or cover removed, increasing the risk of serious injury.

The conductive metal body poses a greater risk of electric shock if the unit has not been manufactured and maintained in accordance with relevant electrical standards, particularly when using water to clean the machine while it is connected to the power socket.

There is no emergency stop device to quickly stop the machine in an emergency.

There may be additional hazards applicable to these and other types of meat processing machines.

Importers, suppliers and persons in control of a workplace have an obligation to ensure that meat processing machinery is safe and without risk to health when used properly. Any person who imports plant (instead of purchasing the plant from a local supplier) for use in a business or undertaking, takes on the obligations of a supplier even if importing or supplying plant is not their usual business. Under workplace health and safety legislation, a supplier has the additional obligation to test and ensure that the plant is safe to use.

Action required

A risk assessment should be conducted at various stages throughout the life of a meat processing machine—when it is new, relocated or following an incident. People who conduct a risk assessment of meat processing machinery should consider whether the equipment has (or is required to be fitted with) the following controls:

  • Guarding from exposure to moving parts using:
  • appropriate fixed guarding, which requires tools for their removal, for example distance guards (a feed chute)
  • interlocked movable guards that cannot be opened until the machine has come to a stop. The control system should not allow the machine to be started while the guards are removed.
  • The existence and appropriate location of emergency stop device(s).
  • The safety-related parts of control systems, such as interlocks and emergency stops, must comply with appropriate technical standards.
  • The design and construction of the machine must ensure safe access for maintenance, effective cleaning and sanitisation.
  • The machine must comply with the relevant legislation for electrical safety.
  • The machine must be accompanied by information about the way it must be used to ensure health and safety.

These controls are not exhaustive and are provided as a guide only. Due to the variety of meat processing machinery used in industry, the controls selected should be based on a risk assessment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Top Five Things You Need To Know About New OHS Laws

New work health and safety laws commenced in the Commonwealth, New South Wales, Queensland, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Northern Territory on 1st January 2012. Victoria, Western Australia and Tasmania have deferred the implementation of these new laws for a further 12 months and South Australian parliament have voted to adjourn the debate on the WHS Bill until 14 February 2012.

There are major changes to workplace health and safety under the new laws and differences from state to territory.  We highly recommend you check with your state or federal authority for detailed information on the changes in your jurisdiction, but here are the top 5 changes that apply across the board.

  1. There are tougher penalties being imposed under the new laws. The penalties provided for under the WHS are serious and employers should be aware of their new obligations. Serious breaches may extend to a maximum of $3 million for a corporation and up to $600,000 for an individual.
  2. The term ‘employer’ that applied in most occupational health and safety laws is replaced with the term ‘person conducting a business or undertaking’ (PCBU) and ‘employee’ is replaced with a broadly defined term of ‘worker’. Duty of care is no longer defined by the nature of employment relationship.  The term ‘worker’ includes employees, volunteers, contractors, sub-contractors, apprentices, work experience students and labour hire personnel. An ‘officer’ on the other hand is a senior executive who makes, or participates in making, decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part, of the business or undertaking. An ‘officer’ must exercise due diligence to ensure that the PCBU complies with WHS legislation. This duty cannot be delegated.
  3.  The term ‘workplace’ in most jurisdictions will be broadened to include any place where a worker goes or is likely to go while at work.  Authorised union representatives will have the right to enter workplaces for health and safety purposes. Penalties will apply where a PCBU hinders union representatives from exercising their powers without reasonable excuse.
  4. Not only will PCBUs have a duty of care in the workplace, but each individual worker will have a duty to ensure their acts or omissions do not negatively impact upon their own, or others’, health and safety. This provision will clarify an individual worker’s right to discontinue or cease work on the grounds of an unsafe or unhealthy workplace.
  5. There is a new duty to consult, co-operate and co-ordinate activities with other duty holders. Employers will need to show that they have provided training in OHS Consultation and actively promote duty holders working together on safety issues. This duty aims to address situations where more than one duty holder is responsible for the same work health and safety matter to ensure that duty holders work together to control work health and safety risk.

There are significant changes to OHS laws but employers who currently comply with the various health and safety laws across Australia should be well positioned to comply with the new regulatory system. If you haven’t already done so, now is a good time to conduct a review of your company’s current workplace health and safety systems to ensure your business complies with the WHS laws to avoid a potential breach in the future.

www.laboursolutions.com.au

Posted in Labour Hire | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Culture “fluff” could make or break your business, experts warn

Talk of an organisation’s culture is often dismissed as HR “fluff”, but according to authors Emily Jaksch and Sarah Gibbins, culture not only has an impact on a business, it defines it.

In their book What is HR?, the authors, both seasoned HR professionals, define culture as: “the behaviour, attitude, beliefs, values, and work ethics of your people”, and “accepted practices at your place of business”.

“It is the way people speak to each other, the way they act, the way they do their jobs, the way they interact with your customers.

“If you have a negative culture (or a confused one), you will not have a sustainable, successful business,” they warn.

Conduct a “culture audit”

Jaksch and Gibbins encourage HR professionals to conduct a “culture audit” of their organisation to determine what it is actually like to work there and whether improvement is needed.

Questions to consider include:

  • Do you find it easy to recruit great people into your business?
  • Do you know why people have left your company in the past 12 months? Have you done anything to address this?
  • Do you often get customer compliments?
  • Do your people know what your customers are saying about the business?
  • When you walk around your business, are people laughing and enjoying themselves?
  • Do your people happily come to work earlier than expected or work later (without you asking them)?
  • Do you have a Christmas party and do most people attend?
  • Do your employees have friendships with each other outside of work?
  • Do you know anything about your employees outside their ‘work life’?
  • Do you/your managers have regular meetings with your employees? In the past six months, have you had an ‘all-in’ company meeting or communication?
  • Do you communicate all changes in your business to all of your employees?
  • Do your people ask for help if there is an issue with their work or the workplace?
  • Do you have an ‘open-door’ policy? (And do people come into your office to ask questions?)
  • Do your managers ‘walk the talk’ when it comes to policy and process?
  • Do your people work outside of the scope of their role without you asking them to?

According to Jaksch and Gibbins, the greater the number of “yes” responses, the better the organisation’s culture.

The authors’ simple advice on creating a more positive culture is to:

  1. Set the boundaries of behaviour;
  2. Communicate! Communicate! Communicate! and
  3. Have fun.

Set the boundaries

In the long run, business goals, mission statements and values, combined with policies, help employers to define acceptable and unacceptable behaviours and practices, to attract the business they want, and be the business that they want to be, Jaksch and Gibbins say.

“If you think ‘policies’ means too many restrictions on your business, you have had the wrong people writing them,” they add.

“We believe in flexible policies that provide guidelines to what is acceptable, but we don’t believe in the ‘policy police’ carrying big sticks.

“Success comes from being able to roll with the punches – and being fast and flexible.”

In addition to addressing behaviour that transgresses an organisation’s boundaries, employers should reward employees who align to the culture and behaviour they want to set, they say.

Communicate! Communicate! Communicate!

“Communication is the single most effective way for you to involve your people and make them love working for you,” say Jaksch and Gibbins.

“We don’t just mean telling them about your policies, mission, and values. Although that is key, it’s just one part of communication. What we mean is talking to your people, but also asking them questions and listening to the answers.

“You should be constantly talking to your people – telling them what is happening and why, so that they feel informed and secure in their jobs. As soon as you start keeping secrets, gossip and incorrect messages start spreading throughout your business. These two factors can be poison for a positive, healthy workplace culture.”

It’s also important to keep asking workers for feedback and ideas. “Not only does it give you more information to improve your business, but it also shows your people that you actually value them, and want them to contribute to the business’s success.

“This is a crucial element – people spend most of their lives at work, so they want to enjoy it, and feel like they are part of the bigger picture. They want to feel like they are contributing to something worthwhile.”

Have fun

“If people love what they do, they will work harder, longer, and better – without fuss,” Jaksch and Gibbins say.

“Of course, people are paid to do a job, so we are not saying it should be a playground. You set the boundaries… but it’s important to have balance.

“Friday lunches, or a laugh around the water cooler, are good things to encourage. If people feel relaxed and happy, they will work harder for you.”

www.laboursolutions.com.au

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Times have changed, but has your training?

Employers are expecting more than ever before from their frontline managers, but they must prepare them to operate in this “challenging environment”, says Andrew Northcott, Labour Solutions Australia’s managing director.

The pace of change in today’s workplace, the degree of ambiguity in which leaders are expected to perform, and the speed with which they are expected to step up, are unprecedented, he says.

“Our frontline leaders are now managing multiple generations in the workplace, they’re often doing that earlier in their career, they’re also operating with teams of people who are wanting to work in more flexible ways.”

There’s not always time to select and train staff before putting them into management roles, Northcott says. The important thing is to strike a balance between having the right person in place and giving people the opportunity to grow, stretch and develop on the job.

“It’s becoming increasingly important to recognise those frontline leaders are really where the organisation’s priorities are played out… where the organisation’s culture and priorities are lived out on a day-to-day basis,” he adds.

“It’s all about the frontline leader being the role model for the organisation, who really does live and breathe [its] culture.

“If we ignore that dynamic within an organisation then we really do miss out on an opportunity to drive the company forward.”

Three key areas

Frontline managers must be prepared to learn throughout their management career, and adapt to new environments and situations, Northcott says.

“There’s a need to develop a deep awareness of themselves and their own capabilities… to be able to understand their own strengths and areas [needing] development.” For example, managers should understand how they organise their thinking, how they prioritise, how they learn at work and what their own personal goals are.

Northcott says training for frontline manages should focus on building capability in the following key areas:

  1. A strong framework - Managers need a framework for decision-making, working practices and organisational planning. They should be able to create a line-of-sight between their organisation’s strategy and individual team members’ performance, and employ “project-management thinking” to deliver specific, measurable results.
  1. Emotional intelligence and performance management - Managers need to understand how they work with others, and develop skill sets and capabilities they can employ to build team and individual performance. As role models for the organisation, they should also be able to lead as well as manage.
  1. Ability to deliver - Managers also need to be equipped to deliver on promises and achieve results. There is an increasing need for organisations to be able to improve what they do – to deliver innovative processes, services and products – and continuously improve on them.

Getting the most out of training

Northcott says a worker’s capabilities – or lack thereof – in these key areas should be considered when making decisions about promotions or looking at a newly-promoted manager’s development needs.

One way to ensure a development program is motivating and engaging for an individual is to let them select areas to focus on based on their own developmental priorities or skill gaps at any given time, he says.

“One individual may need one component… or you may have a group of people you want to take through a complete learning program.

“I think the most essential thing is that first of all, there’s some thinking, some analysis of, why are we doing this development in first place? It’s not just about the input, it’s also about making sure the output is the one required.

“It’s really important for training providers now to be able to demonstrate the impact back into the workplace and for employers investing in that individual to see a change in behaviour, to see something that is positive and different and has an impact back on the team.

“It’s [also] really important to recognise… this is a three-way relationship. It’s important for the employer, the new manager and the provider of learning experience (whether it’s an external or an internal provider) to come together to understand how they will work together on achieving the outcome,” he says.

www.laboursolutions.com.au

Posted in Labour Hire | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Brisbane Labour hire and Recruitment

Starting out with a laptop computer and $800 in the kitty, Labour Solutions Australia has come a long way from its humble beginnings in 2004. With offices now spread across Australia, in Brisbane, Queensland, New South Wales and Western Australia, Labour Solutions is showing no sign of slowing down.

Recognised for 5 consecutive years by BRW Magazine as one of Australia’s fastest growing labour hire and recruitment companies, the Brisbane based, Labour Solutions continues to deliver efficient and reliable workforce solutions for Brisbane businesses.

The Brisbane based company is the labour hire industry leader in providing labour hire and recruitment solutions across a wide range of industries including Mining, Building & Civil Construction, Food Processing & FMCG, Transport/Logistics and Manufacturing.

Our construction labour hire and recruitment teams are drawn from within the industry and are strongly positioned to meet the needs of our construction client base, whether it is sourcing a project manager or a team of carpenters for a short term project.

In Food Processing & FMCG, our dedicated labour hire and workforce management specialists will not only source, screen and select experienced packers and machine operators, but will additionally provide an outsourced labour hire HR function that can offer performance management solutions and health and safety consultation. Transport/Logistics has long been an area of speciality for Labour Solutions, recruiting truck drivers, furniture removalists and pick and packers from some of Australia’s leading logistics and warehousing companies.

Since 2010, the Labour Solutions team has taken their HR service delivery to a whole new level, by offering a complete onsite, workforce management labour hire solutions. With a unique on-ground labour hire approach, Labour Solutions Australia has been able to meet the needs of some of Australia’s leading resource and construction companies.

www.laboursolutions.com.au

Posted in Labour Hire | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Importance of Training

OHSA provides a great insight into the importance of training;

Employers must have an overall safety program including relative site specific safety information where applicable. The safety training program should cover topics such as:

  • Accident Prevention and Safety Promotion
  • Safety Compliance
  • Accident and Emergency Response
  • Personal Protective Equipment
  • Safety Practices
  • Equipment and Machinery
  • Chemical and Hazardous Materials Safety
  • Workplace Hazards
  • Employee Involvement

Employers must document all training as a record of their staff’s attendance.  Creating a training matrix will help keep track of who has been trained, when they were trained, the training topic, and when it is time for refresher training.  Employees must also sign an official sign-in sheet provided by the employer that can serve as proof that employees received proper training.  The sign in sheet must have a broad description of what is being covered in the training.  Tests or quizzes on the presented material can help gauge employee understanding of the material and highlight topics that need to be reviewed.  It is also important to do refresher training as this reminds the employees of the content and what it means to them.

The non-English speaking population is consistently growing in many industries and it is important that employers provide bilingual training for those workers, as OSHA requires that all employees be properly trained.

Most employees display attitudes of disinterest and dread at the thought of attending a safety training, which can leave the trainer feeling frustrated and unappreciated.  It is the trainer’s duty to make safety training fun and educational and with examples the employees can relate to, which will help the trainees to retain the information, enjoy the course, and apply the learning to their work and lives.

Benefits of a training program:

An effective training program can reduce the number of injuries and deaths, property damage, legal liability, illnesses, workers’ compensation claims, and missed time from work.

Safety training classes help establish a safety culture in which employees themselves help to promote proper safety procedures while on the job.  It is important that new employees be properly trained and embraces the importance of workplace safety as it is easy for seasoned workers to negatively influence new staff.  That negative influence however, can be purged with the establishment of new, hands-on, innovative effective safety training which will ultimately lead to an effective safety culture.

www.laboursolutions.com.au

Posted in Labour Hire | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Asbestos Prosecution Brings Home Safety Message

Builders, contractors and tradespeople have been urged to familiarise themselves with workplace asbestos handling procedures or face heavy clean-up costs and prosecution.

Breathing in asbestos fibres has been linked to three respiratory diseases, all of which can be fatal.

• Asbestosis: a chronic lung disease that can lead to respiratory impairment and to diseases such as lung cancer

• Mesothelioma: a cancer of the lining of the pleura (outer lung lining) or of the peritoneum (the lining of the abdominal cavity).

• Lung cancer: caused by asbestos; cannot be distinguished from those cancers that are caused by other agents such as tobacco smoke.

Workplace Health and Safety Queensland (WHSQ) enforces work safety laws, including those involving asbestos, as well as issuing A and B class certificates for asbestos removal for both friable and bonded materials.

A man recently was fined $5500 over the use of a high pressure hose to clean an asbestos roof on a house on Coochiemudlo Island.

The WHSQ prosecution and investigation found the man did not undertake a risk assessment on the project even though he was informed that the roof contained asbestos particles.

Last year, the case was highlighted of a Mackay man being fined $4000 after being prosecuted over the removal of asbestos roof sheeting. He was ripping asbestos sheeting off a roof and breaking it up while people were working in the building below.

Some other cases have involved contractors being required to pay up to $100,000 to get in professional cleaners to clean up their mess.

The WHSQ website spells out the obligations and responsibilities of people working with asbestos, their license requirements and safety tips for removal or maintenance work. You can also download the Queensland Government publication Asbestos: A home renovator’s and tradesperson’s guide for minor work in domestic buildings, which has been updated to include information for contractors.

People who need to be aware of safe asbestos handling procedures include licensed contractors, hirers of high pressure water cleaners, electricians, cleaners and air conditioner installers.

www.laboursolutions.com.au

Posted in Labour Hire | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Chinchilla Recruitment & Labour Hire Solutions

Labour Solutions Australia has been operating for 8 years. First starting out in Brisbane, it has grown to be one of the leading temporary and permanent placement labour hire and recruitment companies in Australia. The company traditionally has a strong focus in Food Processing, Civil and Building Construction, Mining and Engineering, Transport and Logistics, Manufacturing and Agribusiness.

Named as the BRW Fast 100, fastest growing recruitment business for the second year running, Labour Solutions is now tackling the skill shortages head on in the booming coal seam gas sector in Darling Down communities such as Chinchilla and Dalby. Through international recruitment sourcing, and a truly innovative IT platform, Labour Solutions is placed in a strong position to offer labour hire and recruitment solutions for roles ranging from experienced plant operators and drivers, site and project engineers, civil superintendents, site foremen, skilled civil labourers, administrators and safety advisers.

In the last two years, Labour Solutions has taken their HR service delivery to a whole new level, offering a complete onsite, workforce management solution. The ability to truly understand and meet the workforce needs of some of Australia’s leading names in the resources and construction sectors, has been enhanced by this proactive and on ground labour hire approach to workforce planning, recruitment and management.

www.laboursolutions.com.au

Posted in Labour Hire, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fair Work Act: Its impact within Australian Workplaces

In late 2006, the Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI) conducted a research study to gain information into the operation of Federal Industrial relations’ legislation. The first survey was conducted in 2007 to gather opinions relating to the Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005. A second survey was conducted in 2010, finding an early understanding of the problems and prospects confronting HR professionals as they sought to make sense of and manage labour under a new legislative regime.

The most recent report findings deal with the same Federal legislation as the second survey conducted in 2010. This allows for some emerging trends to be identified on the workplace impact of the Fair Work Act 2009. Where applicable, the results from both the 2010 and present survey are listed in the report below.

The current survey was delivered to the AHRI’s members and was open between August and November 2011. Of the 18 000 members, 691 responded. Most of the questions asked in the current survey replicated questions asked in the 2010 survey, so that comparisons could be made between the two sets of data.

No analysis of the data presented in this report is attempted. What is given are the unmediated findings of both surveys, with supporting commentary summarising the key points.

The key findings at a glance

63% of respondents report an increased level of record keeping under the Fair Work Act (58% reported that in 2010).

• 47% of respondents believe that operating under the Fair Work Act will decrease their organisation’s willingness to employ people over the next three years

• 51% believe industrial relations costs will increase further in a year’s time (37% believed that in 2010)

• 65% report it taking more time to formulate employment contracts (down marginally from 68% in 2010)

• 47% report spending more time bargaining over employment contracts (40% reported that in 2010).

• 46% report the negotiation of employment contracts is more difficult (38% reported that in 2010), but 38% also believe negotiating employment contracts will become more difficult in 12 months’ time (25% believed that in 2010).

• 29% report productivity has decreased (13% reported that in 2010).

• 31% believe that allowing individual labour contracts, subject to a “better off overall’ test, would either somewhat or greatly improve productivity

• 31% believe allowing a choice between union and non-union negotiated agreements would somewhat or greatly improve productivity.

• 40% believe greater flexibility in use of contractors and labour hire firms would positively impact productivity

• 47% report the importance of managing union relations has increased (39% reported that in 2010).

• 41% report the number of union visits to work sites has increased (29% reported that in 2010).

• 58% report labour costs have increased (45% reported that in 2010).

• 33% report the number of parent leave days allowed per annum has increased (20% reported that in 2010).

• 31% report the number of personal carer days allowed per annum has increased (20% reported that in 2010).

• 47% report that overall remuneration has increased (30% reported that in 2010)

• 42% report flexible employee working arrangements have increased while 18% report they decreased, with 38% reporting ‘no change’. This question was not asked in 2010.

• 35% report that under the new unfair dismissal threshold it has been harder to make jobs redundant (26% reported that in 2010).

More information regarding these surveys can be found on the Australian Human Resources Institute.

www.laboursolutions.com.au

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment